West 21 Wheatley Hills 18

By El Pedro - February 26 2011
West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Injury-time Winner
A thrilling comeback in the last 10 minutes rescued an unlikely victory from this fiercely contested game. Andrew Foreman's injury time try earned us the points after Wheatley Hills had been reduced to 13-men by two straight red cards.

The game was a brutal contest with referee Charl Erasmus given the almost impossible task of controlling the two sets of players. The fact that there were as many cards as tries is probably a fair reflection on the game, which was again played on a fairly poor Brinkburn pitch, more rain having done little to help the damage done to the surface during last week's encounter with Percy Park.

The first half was full of incident but unfortunately little of it to do with rugby. We had the better of the early exchanges, but failed to capitalise on a couple of visits to the 22 including seeing a Gareth  Foreman penalty drift wide after only 2 minutes.

Wheatley Hills were first on the scoreboard with a simple Guy Townsley penalty on 21 minutes awarded as the backs crept up offside while defending deep in the 22.

The first yellow card of the afternoon appeared on the half hour with Hills talisman number eight Gareth Burns dismissed following an incident that forced Colin Cheslin off the field to be replaced by Darren Thomas. The card was barely back in the pocket before being reproduced for second row Dan Undy, his high tackle on Luke Watson taking place in the very next play.

We had to make the 2 man advantage count and did, kicking penalties to touch twice and driving a maul over the line where Andrew Davies emerged from the bottom of the pile the scorer. Gareth Foreman nailed the wide conversion for a 7-3 lead which remained at the break as we missed out on repeating the maul in the other corner when the lineout was overthrown.

Hills came out on fire at the start of the second half and we looked shell-shocked as they stormed into the lead with two tries in 3 minutes. First Burns pickup from a 5 metre scrum saw the league's leading try scorer add another to his tally and then the number eight turned provider as his storming run set up a good attacking position, the try eventually being finished off in the same corner by wing Tom Barker.

We looked to be on the ropes, and heads dropped further when Gareth Foreman skewed a simple penalty wide on 53 minutes. Things got worse when Gav Robinson saw yellow for a block and Townsley slotted over the resultant penalty, although the visitors could feel a little aggrieved that had advantage been played they would likely have scored a try under the posts. Nevertheless, a first home defeat of the season now looked increasingly on the cards.

At 18-7 behind with 20 minutes to go a comeback seemed unlikely but momentum shifted after another flare up involving the vast majority of both sides. With the players finally separated referee Erasmus showed his red card to both Andrew Penno and replacement Luke Taplin, presumably for specific acts as the fighting had involved many other players. 14 against 15 now became 14 against 13 and as time ticked on we started to put together a few phases for the first time in the half.

With 10 minutes to play confusion reigned as the referee blew what sounded like a full-time whistle as yet more blows were exchanged between the forwards. Players began walking off only to be called back and after a lengthy stoppage the game continued. Good ball retention saw us plough our way into the 22 but a loose pass looked to end the chance with the line only metres away. However, we were reprieved with a free kick from the resulting scrum and a quick tap saw Adam Coates drive over for a try converted by Gav Robinson.
Suddenly we were back in with a chance and with a couple of minutes plus injury time to play the game was far from over. Liam Bailey made a storming run upfield as time ticked on and Darren Thomas popped up with a couple of good runs to move us into the 22. A few surges for the line went close before Andrew Foreman saw half a gap and got the ball down on the line for the try to be awarded.

Gav Robinson got his second conversion with the last kick of the game and somehow, having looked down and out, we had manufactured a win and definitely used up one of our 'Get Out of Jail' cards.


West: C Cheslin, A Cheslin (Thomas), Watson, G Robinson, Larkin, G Foreman, A Foreman, Carr, A Dixon, Coates, Davies, Lloyd (Miller), D Boatman, Bailey, Stockdale.

Tries: Davies, Coates, A Foreman
Cons: G Foreman, Robinson 2

Sin-bin: Robinson


Wheatley Hills: Marshall, Webb, M Hayward, S Hayward, Barker, Townsley, Scully, O'Donovan, Cahill, Ogilvey, Undy, Penno, Buckenham, Elliot, Burns.
Reps: Staley, Plevey, Taplin

Tries: Burns, Barker
Con: Townsley
Pens: Townsley 2

Sin-bin: Burns, Undy
Sent-off: Penno, Taplin


Referee: Charl Erasmus [Durham Society]


 
West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Official West Hartlepool RFC (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 10:41


Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: West Park Allotment (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 11:03

I am just about lost for words after this game. Probably the least said the better except to sympathise with the referee who did exceptionally well under the ciricumstances.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Dogtrack (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 11:10

I agree ... the ref did do well, but he had his hands full.
I heard some of their supporters saying the ref had given the game to West.
In fact, Wheatley Hills gave the game to West through their indiscipline.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Neil Etherington (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 11:19

Well done to all the West players for keeping going to the end and snatching victory in the most unpleasant of circumstances.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 27/02/2011 11:30 by davepicken.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Dog Track (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 11:49

I see Wheatley Hills are at Percy Park next weekend. Could be interesting - there were three sent off (2 WH, 1 PP) when they met earlier in the season.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 27/02/2011 12:55 by Dog Track.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: exiled west 2 (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 12:26

many thanks for the excellent report elpedro and well done to all our club teams

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: west girl (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 12:42

Well done Pete on probably the hardest match to report on!

The least said the better is definitely the best thing - not looking forward to the return match in April.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: MikeyBoy (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 14:09

Good to get the win when it looked like we were heading for defeat. Bizarre game with "interesting" travelling support. Regardless of the end result I also sympathise with the ref, who as people have already said, did well in very difficult conditions.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: westie88 (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 14:19

I couldn't disagree more; I think the ref was very poor! He seen the 13 throw a punch at Anth Carr and only spoke to his captain and also only give their number 8 a yellow card for his act of foul play on Cheslin. If the referee made the correct decisions on these two early acts of foul play then maybe Wheatley Hills wouldn't have continued in the same manner!

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Greenman (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 16:26

I was not at the game as iwas away with WH seconds, but can someone please explain how the ref can abandon the match at 77 minutes and restart the game, play somewhere between 9 and 11 minutes extra time???

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Dogtrack (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 17:37

Did he blow the final whistle, or was he just fed up of the fighting? It was too early for the end, and all the interuptions meant a lot of time needed to be added.
The whistle threw a lot of people, including the West player who had to be called back from almost in the changing rooms.
He must have been busting!!

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: "When I was a lad..." (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 17:46

Dear Greenman,

There was 10 minutes to go when the confusion arose, not after 77 minutes!
So the right amount of time was played by the end of the game.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 27/02/2011 17:49 by "When I was a lad...".

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: ruprett (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 19:54

surprised they never abandoned the match , stop you playing the return fixture and dock you ten points. this seems to be the normall way the county are dealing with this sort of thing this season!!!!!

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: El Pedro (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 20:17

The final whistle wasn't actually blown early, what I was getting it as it was the sort of whistle blow normally used to signify the end of a half/match and so had quite a few players/supporters confused.
After that incident there was a good 4-5 minute stoppage (almost as long as half time!) while various players were spoken to and the captains then speaking to their own players. That was where the injury time came from - and we kept the ball alive for the last 3-4 mins (if I remember rightly we had to tap a penalty because it was the last play) so full-time would have been blown if there'd been a stop in play.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: MikeyBoy (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 21:17

westie88 - fair point. early action may have helped matters

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: greenman (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 22:12

The question remains was the game abandoned or not??????

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Andy Quinn (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 22:18

Obvoiusly not as the game carried on did'nt it?

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: west girl (IP Logged)
Date: 27/02/2011 22:32

greenman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The question remains was the game abandoned or
> not??????

the only person who can answer that is the ref!!

he blew up hard at the 70th minute prob cos he was fed up - like most of us - of the actions of a few players (and others!!) - he spoke to the captains and individuals let the situation calm down and played on for the 9 - 10 minutes that were left.

He couldn't blow up til the ball went dead - which it did when we scored the try etc which was from a penalty that he has to let play. Oh and there was a fair bit of injury time since two of our players were flat out at one point or another.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Westy Till I Die (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 09:59

Can't wait for DP's highlights !!

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: West Gazz (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 10:16

Totally agree with Westie88. I know it was tough to ref but if he got a grip of the game from the early stages then maybe the indiscipline from the away side would have been controlled a little.

Also agree with Ruprett; I gather there are other clubs who have complained about Wheatley Hills. They were simply disgraceful and the league needs to take a long hard look at them.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Westy Till I Die (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 10:26

As Jesus' mate Peter once said ' He who lives by the sword shall die by the sword'.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: west girl (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 10:47

Westy Till I Die Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As Jesus' mate Peter once said ' He who lives by
> the sword shall die by the sword'.

lol - DP I miss the smilies on this site.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: proud dad (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 11:54

Just looked at Wheatley hills web site
They show their player statitics. In the yellow and red card column they show as not having received a red or yellow card all season
Did not look like little Angels



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 28/02/2011 11:57 by proud dad.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Supercodhead (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 12:05

i warned you about Wheatley Hooligans after they played us last year >>>biggest brawl ive ever seen at the Friarage>>>you must have been well matched>>>

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Frank Warren (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 12:42

I'd be interested in promoting the return match at Doncaster,the BBC are also interested as there are likely to be more punches thrown than in an Audley Harrison fight.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: West Park Allotment (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 13:01

I don't this is a subject we should be poking fun at.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: west girl (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 13:26

All joking aside it must cost them a fortune in disciplinary hearings.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: smurray (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 15:54


Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Westy Till I Die (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 16:04

First rugby match I've watched that was played under Marquis of Queensbury Rules !!!

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: bent leg (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 16:33

westie till i die, u cant of watched many games then with gentle characters at your club like "bully boy" bennet, chocky davies and anth"the hitman"car

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Lets Do Time Warp - Yehhhh (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 17:49

Bully Boy Bennet. Wowwee, now thats a blast from the past & I am sure he is enjoying life in the sun

Amazing how they comment on here and Lord Lucan their own site. What next Brierton Lane.

Read the Mail and remember the words

Optimism
Surrender
Capitulatiom
Humiliation

Suggest you look in the mirror and get out of your time warp

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: video (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 18:55

did DP get a video of this game?

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: bigand (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 22:37

go on then post the video of the red card incident lets see the westie players not throwing puchers

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: westie88 (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 22:58

Bigand no one has claimed that none of the west players didn't throw a punch in that incident; but one of your players ran in from quite a distance to start fighting and the other one who was red carded decided to throw another punch once everything seemed to have stopped!

If you were at the game you will know that Wheatley Hills clearly came to try and bully west off their game! It may be frowned upon but if I was Oli or Tim I would congratulate the lads for fronting upto them!

Several of the Wheatley Hills supporters had a lot to say on the touch line and making claims like "expect worse at our place" will do nothing for their reputation!

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: west girl (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 23:08

bigand Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> go on then post the video of the red card incident
> lets see the westie players not throwing puchers

I really can't believe you can't see that you lost the game by your own actions - the ref did the only thing he could during that incident and stood back and studied what was going on - he then made the decision and took the action that he felt right - his decision was not influenced in any way by any one from WEST.

Why you find the need to come on here and make stupid statements is beyond me - we as a club are not going to publicise any of the unsportsmanlike conduct - by any player - that took place on the pitch on Saturday - but since it hasn't occurred with such intensity in any of our other games this season it could only point to one variable!

You have your own website - use it!





Sorry DP - I tried my hardest to bite my tongue x

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: west girl (IP Logged)
Date: 28/02/2011 23:11

westie88 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> If you were at the game you will know that
> Wheatley Hills clearly came to try and bully west
> off their game! It may be frowned upon but if I
> was Oli or Tim I would congratulate the lads for
> fronting upto them!

and congratulate them on maturing enough over recent years to step back


>
> Several of the Wheatley Hills supporters had a lot
> to say on the touch line and making claims like
> "expect worse at our place" will do nothing for
> their reputation!


it's a real pity that it's likely to be our last away trip in the league and as we do like a bus trip and the possibility of "P" would have made it a good celebratory trip - not going to happen now I don't feel.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: wheatley lad (IP Logged)
Date: 01/03/2011 07:00

OK I've bit my tongue, but to say that you've to expect worse at our is a disgusting thing to say, we make every club welcome at our lace, so I suggest you stop any talk of that right now.

As for the game, someone's already said it, but you won we lost, we're grown up enough to accept that but what is hard to take is the "it was all them, not us" attitude. Your very fair match report states clearly players from both sides were involved in most incidents. It was only the week before that your game against Percy Park is reported as spilling over several times so please don't act like its never happened before.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: west girl (IP Logged)
Date: 01/03/2011 07:21

wheatley lad Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OK I've bit my tongue, but to say that you've to
> expect worse at our is a disgusting thing to say,
> we make every club welcome at our lace, so I
> suggest you stop any talk of that right now.

I agree entirely that any club should be made welcome but it was your supporters etc making the statements and this took place at various points around the ground - maybe you should put your own house in order before coming on here telling us what to do!


>
> As for the game, someone's already said it, but
> you won we lost, we're grown up enough to accept
> that but what is hard to take is the "it was all
> them, not us" attitude. Your very fair match
> report states clearly players from both sides were
> involved in most incidents. It was only the week
> before that your game against Percy Park is
> reported as spilling over several times so please
> don't act like its never happened before.

Noone has said that there hasn't been flare ups in any of our games but what has been said is the intensity of the incidents has not happened before not only this season but for a long while.

And to be fair it is our website so there are going to be biased views.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: wheatley lad (IP Logged)
Date: 01/03/2011 07:33

And I suppose I could repeat some not very nice things and aggressive things said to us from your spectators but as I couldn't prove anything it would just libellous and unfair. I'm not trying to tell you what to do I'm just trying to ease your worries that you won't be made welcome here.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Roy Kelly (IP Logged)
Date: 01/03/2011 11:58

I've had my say on Saturday's events in my day job and I'm not going to ramble on on here as well but I am told from people who've already been to Wheatley Hills this season that the hospitality was top drawer.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: El Pedro (IP Logged)
Date: 01/03/2011 12:51

wheatley lad Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Your very fair match report...


Thanks for that...normally I'm accused of being biased!

I am as passionate a West fan as anyone on here but for what it's worth I don't think the blame can be laid entirely at the door of Wheatley Hills - yes they came to play a physical game and that went too far at times but I'm not naive enough to think our players were 100% innocent.

What I don't understand is the criticism of the two red cards about which more than one Wheatley supporter said to me "how can you send two players from the same side off for fighting...did they punch each other". Firstly, if red cards were being dished out for punches we'd have been playing 3-a-side. The referee obviously saw something specific from those two players that he felt was worse than anything else he'd seen - otherwise why make such a decision.

As for all the talk about the return match - I think we're getting caught up in the heat of the moment. I'm sure the hospitality will be good, just like every other club and I expect another physical game but there's no reason to think it's going to be anything like Saturday.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: wheatley lad (IP Logged)
Date: 01/03/2011 13:23

El Pedro, anyone who was able to watch that match and keep their mind on writing notes to be able to create a match report is very dedicated to the cause indeed.
As for the criticism of the red cards, from a personal opinion, if the cards were given to two West players and not ours would you feel aggrieved? Bear in mind that you have stated you couldn't see anything to suggest why it should be that way (I'm not saying there wasn't a reason, just that, like you, I saw nothing to suggest anything but an equal amount of cards).

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: West Park Allotment (IP Logged)
Date: 01/03/2011 14:24

The only opinion that matters on this is the Referee's. He was right on the spot and gave his view to the WH captain before showing the cards.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Dogtrack (IP Logged)
Date: 01/03/2011 16:51

I'd love to know what he said to the WH captain.
I bet he's not on their Xmas card list, though.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: westie88 (IP Logged)
Date: 01/03/2011 19:00

I believe The ginger lad got red carded for deciding to throw a punch once the fistycuffs had ended, flaring everything up again!

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Ref (IP Logged)
Date: 02/03/2011 09:07

Hi All,
I havent posted for sometime, and usually stay out of debates etc. However, on reading this thread I feel the need to make a few general remarks. I was not at the match as was officiating elsewhere. From a referee's perspective, we see events from a unique angle which is often different from that of the spectators and players(we are closer to the situation, but may have obstructions blocking our view). When a mass brawl breaks out (which I assume from reading this thread, thats what happened), it is difficult to decide what went on. The best we can do is stand back, observe and wait until it fizzles out if the players do not respond to whistles.

When observing we are looking for a number of things, are players running from a distance to join the situation. The level of injuries being sustained. Opportunity of players to protect themselves or avoid being hit. Areas of the body being hit. Level of intent involved with the punches/kicks etc.

Once the situation has stopped referees will then work one of a number of scenarios to deal with the situation. One scenario is sometimes to deal with the players that started the situation. Another is to deal with players that joined after the fight had stopped. A further situation is to deal with foul play which knocks players to the floor. There is no exact science to this, so all a referee can do is get themself in a position to be able to see something and be effective.

At the end of the day, the referee in this game, observed the situation, noticed some act of foul play by some individuals of a greater intent than others, and had decided whatever they had done warranted a sending off.

The only way you will find out the exact reasoning behind these cards is to be at the disciplinary hearing and listen to the further explanations in relation to the report.

Cheers
PF

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: West.fan (IP Logged)
Date: 02/03/2011 10:25

Thanks Ref for your concise explanation of the situation, very much appreciated.

On reflection, I for one thought the referee handled most situations very well, considering the difficult circumstances that arose throughout the game.

He can only officiate the game as he sees it!

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Denny Dixon (IP Logged)
Date: 02/03/2011 10:36

What's done is done and let us just wish Wheatley Hills the best and that they dish out a beating ( sorry for that word ) to Percy Park as we may well need them to. Let us hope for a better display by our boys than at home to Pontefract, the only game I was able to see this season when they travel there this week.Well done to the Stags and Bucks once again.
The story of Keith Baggs reminded me of the Euthanasians trip when we got to Aspatria to watch the Pilkington Cup clash and another typical Baggsie comment as we were next to each other in the toilet cubicles without toilet roll and he asked me if he could borrow a ten bob note!!! Never forotten that nor the full weekend including "disco dancer" call at the line out!!!!

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: West Park Allotment (IP Logged)
Date: 02/03/2011 11:37

Thanks to the Ref for that insight.
Not so happy about the insight from Denny about Keith Baggs. We always assumed that like Royalty Baggsy never went to the toilet.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Supercodhead (IP Logged)
Date: 02/03/2011 12:04

why do you think every other club called him 'shitbaggs' >>>

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: MikeyBoy (IP Logged)
Date: 02/03/2011 13:44

The ref obviously knows that 2 red cards in that situation is going to be controversial so he must have had clear reasons for doing so. It would have been easy for him to just give a red to each side but he didn't, presumably because he has seen two specific incidents that stood out from the rest (in the various ways mentioned by ref above)

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Help The Ref (IP Logged)
Date: 02/03/2011 16:45


Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Dogtrack (IP Logged)
Date: 02/03/2011 16:49

Very interesting, Help the Ref, but what's that got to do with it?

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: West Park Allotment (IP Logged)
Date: 03/03/2011 09:55

DP - do we have to tolerate this repeated bad language from the Headland headcase?

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: minimoneyman (IP Logged)
Date: 03/03/2011 10:39

Just read wheatley hills report on their website
Unbelievable!!!!!

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: West Girl (IP Logged)
Date: 03/03/2011 11:29


Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: wheatley lad (IP Logged)
Date: 03/03/2011 11:39

The match report put on our pitchero is copied and pasted from our local paper, and would like to have thought the person updating it would have used a bit more common sense as to take out some of the provocative statements in the report.
I don't agree in it being copied on to our website.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: legaleagle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/03/2011 11:49


Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: wheatley lad (IP Logged)
Date: 03/03/2011 11:58

I'd like to think the inference of 'north-east referee' came from the fact it's the name of the league we play in and good luck proving otherwise.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: legaleagle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/03/2011 12:01

The inference is that the official kept on playing until West won which is quite disgraceful. As I say it is up to the RFU and the official.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: The Supercodhead (IP Logged)
Date: 03/03/2011 12:13

this is the very first time in my entire life that ive been on Wests side>>i'm going to have to go for a lie down>>> after ive worked out what 'gauging' is>>>



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/03/2011 12:14 by The Supercodhead.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: west girl (IP Logged)
Date: 03/03/2011 12:21

and The Star is a sister paper of The Hartlepool Mail and they could have used Roy's fair report.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Supercodhead (IP Logged)
Date: 03/03/2011 12:34

ive had a lie down and feel much better>>>now decided i'm on nobodys side after all >>>

ow West Park Argument >> get a bloody life will you >>

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: MikeyBoy (IP Logged)
Date: 03/03/2011 12:54

from their report, I'm not sure why "no one in the wheatley camp could understand where the extra time came from"

did no one in the "wheatley camp" notice the lenghty stoppages when the red cards where given and at the time when we thought the match had been abandoned?

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Dogtrack (IP Logged)
Date: 03/03/2011 15:01

Another example of the "Nobody likes us, we don't care" attitude which often prevails in certain necks of the woods, if you know where I mean.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: scrum half (IP Logged)
Date: 03/03/2011 21:33

Good to see Wheatley lad cleared up the misunderstanding that it was a NE referee the writer thought might be biased, but in fact he meant any referee in the league they play in.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Roy Kelly (IP Logged)
Date: 03/03/2011 21:37

I sincerely hope and pray that that match report on the Hills website did not appear in any newspaper. Absolutely no balance to it, at all.
It's bad enough stuff like that appearing on a website never mind in print.
And there are serious accusations in there which they should either substantiate or withdraw.

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: When I was a lad... (IP Logged)
Date: 03/03/2011 22:22


Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Roy Kelly (IP Logged)
Date: 03/03/2011 23:02

Oh dear

Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: smurray (IP Logged)
Date: 04/03/2011 17:46

If he was trying to gauge penno what did he think, was he good, bad indifferent or dirty.

Goto Thread: PreviousNext
Goto: Message ListLog In

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net