 |
 |
 |
 |
Re: result
Posted by: foot knack full back (IP Logged)
Date: 31 January, 2009 17:36
rovers won again 22-7 :-D
Re: result
Posted by: exiled west (IP Logged)
Date: 31 January, 2009 18:09
thanks for the update west girl, dont forget to ask malk if they want to stop off at tewkesbury rugby club before or after
Re: result
Posted by: Minny Mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 31 January, 2009 18:22
Re: result
Posted by: west girl (IP Logged)
Date: 31 January, 2009 18:27
i forwarded ur email to him and we'll sort it soon x
Re: result
Posted by: Love Spuds (IP Logged)
Date: 31 January, 2009 18:45
Watched the game and i thought West competed well in different periods of the game. Westoe played to their strengths and basically bullied West out of the game. Fair play to them, you get away with what the ref will allow. West needed a big nasty forward to front up to them but did not happen. I thought Myers was outstanding again and was a real thorn in their side.
Hard luck fellas, well stuck at :)
Hard luck fellas, well stuck at :)
Re: result
Posted by: Tim the ref (IP Logged)
Date: 31 January, 2009 18:59
Beverley 13 - 9 Birkenhead Park
Hull 3 - 5 Sheffield Tigers
Middlesbrough 40 - 6 Cleckheaton
Morley 41 - 0 West Park (St Helens)
Stockport 55 - 10 Darlington
West Hartlepool 6 - 17 Westoe
Hull 3 - 5 Sheffield Tigers
Middlesbrough 40 - 6 Cleckheaton
Morley 41 - 0 West Park (St Helens)
Stockport 55 - 10 Darlington
West Hartlepool 6 - 17 Westoe
Re: result
Posted by: MikeyBoy (IP Logged)
Date: 31 January, 2009 22:44
we never really played in their half and rarely got into their 22 and while I thought we were pretty good defensively, we offered little in attack, with a lot of handling errors.
I didn't think that westoe's backs were very good today either, certainly not as good as our previous match with them.
I didn't think that westoe's backs were very good today either, certainly not as good as our previous match with them.
Re: result
Posted by: Love Spuds (IP Logged)
Date: 31 January, 2009 22:47
I thought their 10 and 12 were the pick of their backs
Re: result
Posted by: MikeyBoy (IP Logged)
Date: 01 February, 2009 17:13
their 12 was good, he made a lot of powerful runs. but haswell??? are you joking??? He didn't get their backs going at all, kicked most of the ball he got and never made any ground with the ball in hand. The one exception being the try - when he threw a decent dummy and then dropped the ball because he was celebrating, but the ref let him have it anyway!
Re: result
Posted by: PCH (IP Logged)
Date: 01 February, 2009 18:01
Oh MickeyBoy how bitter you sound SCH hasn't been rattling your cage has he?
:oD:oD:oD:oD:oD
Post Edited (01-02-09 18:02)
:oD:oD:oD:oD:oD
Post Edited (01-02-09 18:02)
Re: result
Posted by: Love Spuds (IP Logged)
Date: 01 February, 2009 19:43
Enough said really Mikeyboy. The try was enough wasn't it?
Like i said earlier we needed a big nasty forward to front up to their forwards but seemed not to have one on the day
Like i said earlier we needed a big nasty forward to front up to their forwards but seemed not to have one on the day
Re: result
Posted by: Broken Army (IP Logged)
Date: 01 February, 2009 20:59
Should have given you a few pints before hand Spuds and you would have done the job. :-P
Re: result
Posted by: stag1012 (IP Logged)
Date: 02 February, 2009 08:09
I agree with Quinny. We need someone who will take the ball on and make us ground. Chocky was a big ball carrier last season and we are deffinately missing him around the park.
Re: result
Posted by: Chocky's Butler (IP Logged)
Date: 02 February, 2009 10:24
Definitely missing Chockys presence at times but Robinson will be back soon and judging by training nights so will Jonny Boatman and Carlo
Re: result
Posted by: MikeyBoy (IP Logged)
Date: 02 February, 2009 10:55
i know westoe would have won without haswell's "try" as we weren't offering anything in attack, and don't confuse my rant about haswell with sour grapes about the result. Westoe closed out the match well. my previous post was just about haswell at 10 - how anyone could think he had a good game is beyond me
Re: result
Posted by: West Park Allotment (IP Logged)
Date: 02 February, 2009 11:19
More concerned with our performance than that of the opposition. Westoe wanted the win more than we did and were a very efficient side. Good luck to them.
Once again we didn't make it easy for ourselves in the backs with too many wayward passes and lack of handling skills. Don't thin the experiment of switching Moss worked either.
Once again we didn't make it easy for ourselves in the backs with too many wayward passes and lack of handling skills. Don't thin the experiment of switching Moss worked either.
Re: result
Posted by: west girl (IP Logged)
Date: 02 February, 2009 11:24
I partly agree WPA but Mossy seemed to play better in the centre - he took more crash ball and seemed more commited to moving forward.
What was noticeable was the impact Dash made when he came on.
What was noticeable was the impact Dash made when he came on.
Re: result
Posted by: Player 1 (IP Logged)
Date: 02 February, 2009 11:33
Let me assure you WPA the players wanted to win.
Re: result
Posted by: West Park Allotment (IP Logged)
Date: 02 February, 2009 11:35
Agree about Thomas.
Moss did his best but he has more influence with his boot at 10 . We have two crash ball merchants in Connoly and Hodgson so we don need a third.
Of course if you are taking a ball at speed its helpful if someone can pass it into you midriff and not fire it at your head.
Moss did his best but he has more influence with his boot at 10 . We have two crash ball merchants in Connoly and Hodgson so we don need a third.
Of course if you are taking a ball at speed its helpful if someone can pass it into you midriff and not fire it at your head.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.