 |
 |
 |
 |
Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: The Supercodhead (IP Logged)
Date: 03 March, 2011 12:13
this is the very first time in my entire life that ive been on Wests side>>i'm going to have to go for a lie down>>> after ive worked out what 'gauging' is>>>
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/03/2011 12:14 by The Supercodhead.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/03/2011 12:14 by The Supercodhead.
Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: west girl (IP Logged)
Date: 03 March, 2011 12:21
and The Star is a sister paper of The Hartlepool Mail and they could have used Roy's fair report.
Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Supercodhead (IP Logged)
Date: 03 March, 2011 12:34
ive had a lie down and feel much better>>>now decided i'm on nobodys side after all >>>
ow West Park Argument >> get a bloody life will you >>
ow West Park Argument >> get a bloody life will you >>
Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: MikeyBoy (IP Logged)
Date: 03 March, 2011 12:54
from their report, I'm not sure why "no one in the wheatley camp could understand where the extra time came from"
did no one in the "wheatley camp" notice the lenghty stoppages when the red cards where given and at the time when we thought the match had been abandoned?
did no one in the "wheatley camp" notice the lenghty stoppages when the red cards where given and at the time when we thought the match had been abandoned?
Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Dogtrack (IP Logged)
Date: 03 March, 2011 15:01
Another example of the "Nobody likes us, we don't care" attitude which often prevails in certain necks of the woods, if you know where I mean.
Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: scrum half (IP Logged)
Date: 03 March, 2011 21:33
Good to see Wheatley lad cleared up the misunderstanding that it was a NE referee the writer thought might be biased, but in fact he meant any referee in the league they play in.
Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Roy Kelly (IP Logged)
Date: 03 March, 2011 21:37
I sincerely hope and pray that that match report on the Hills website did not appear in any newspaper. Absolutely no balance to it, at all.
It's bad enough stuff like that appearing on a website never mind in print.
And there are serious accusations in there which they should either substantiate or withdraw.
It's bad enough stuff like that appearing on a website never mind in print.
And there are serious accusations in there which they should either substantiate or withdraw.
Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: Roy Kelly (IP Logged)
Date: 03 March, 2011 23:02
Oh dear
Re: West 21 Wheatley Hills 18
Posted by: smurray (IP Logged)
Date: 04 March, 2011 17:46
If he was trying to gauge penno what did he think, was he good, bad indifferent or dirty.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.