Re: Planning for next season???
Posted by:
wivey (IP Logged)
Date: 21 April, 2008 16:09
I received this email from Jim Hackett today:-
"Hi Bob
Having read the message board regarding Adam and how the club has left him in the lurch following his injury, I'm pretty sure that Andy explained the matter in a previous message board article.
Just to clarify things for the one or two people that have expressed disappointment in our treatment of Adam, I can advise that following Adam's return from Australia, despite his injuring both knee medial ligaments during his independently arranged trial, we arranged to pay for independent physio treatment to ensure his return to fitness. The physio that treated Adam gave him the all clear to return to traing and following four training sessions with the squad, Adam and the coaching staff deemed him fit enough to start the match against Neath. Unfortunately, the injury suffered against Neath was the cruciate ligament, therefore, not the original injury we had been made aware of, this was only diagnosed following an MAI scan organised and paid for by the club.
From the time of his injury the club paid Adam the amount of money due to him under the terms of his contract up until Christmas. In the weeks leading up to Christmas I sat down with Adam and explained that with the club continuing to pay him during the period of his injury and the likelihood of his being out at least for another year which would take him past his contact expiry date, we would continue to support him financially if he would consider signing an extension to his contract. Adam was not willing to extend his contract with the club so I then passed the matter over to the Chairman at the time and he sat down with Adam and negotiated a settlement with him that was accepted by both parties. With the negotiated settlement effectively ending Adams time with the club, we have no reason to continue monitoring his fitness progress, and as the surgery he has undergone was arranged via the PFA, we are satisfied that we've fulfilled our financial and moral obligations to a player that was unwilling to stay at the club.
In Adam's defence, he was allowed to go to Australia by the club, however, it appears that the clubs he attended for trials did not have insurance cover in place, which ultimately compromised our contracted player.
Whilst it's disappointing that Adam is alleged to be making certain remarks to supporters of another club about Connah's Quay Nomads and his treatment by us, as mentioned above, we have acted properly throughout the matter. Unfortunately people reading and writing on your message board have been a little too quick to pass judgement on a matter they obviously have very little knowledge about, so hopefully this message will correct any misunderstanding.
I am disappointed that supporters who enjoy expressing their support for the club, can be so quick to criticise without full knowledge of the facts.
Cheers
Jim"