Goto Thread: PreviousNext
Goto: Message ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Waterloo 32 West 27
Posted by: Official West Hartlepool RFC (IP Logged)
Date: 01 April, 2012 13:45

What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.

Re: Waterloo 32 West 27
Posted by: bilbo baggins (IP Logged)
Date: 01 April, 2012 14:03

barker played in the centre?

Re: Waterloo 32 West 27
Posted by: Dave Picken (IP Logged)
Date: 01 April, 2012 21:11

He played in the back row. Jonny boatman went to centre.

Re: Waterloo 32 West 27
Posted by: Denny Dixon (IP Logged)
Date: 02 April, 2012 04:18

Seems as if another 3 to 4 points got away from us. Well done those who were drafted in however to pick up a bonus point. We MUST sort out this problem we have had all season with availability of players away from home (maybe we should invest in a nav sat too!!!). Any decent away results and I reckon at leasy 15 points more could easily have been gained and we would have been up amongst the top 3 to 4 teams.also the Lymm results could come back to haunt us in the quest for 5th position.

Re: Waterloo 32 West 27
Posted by: Stuart Bennett (IP Logged)
Date: 02 April, 2012 09:17

I remember the Waterloo No 8 - He used to play for Liverpool St Helens!!

Re: Waterloo 32 West 27
Posted by: whats this then (IP Logged)
Date: 02 April, 2012 10:48

Decent game today, nice running & hands from the Loo backs, good to see O'Brian back among the tries with a hattrick.....



Frayed tempers at the end resulted in a yellow for their 19 for a pretty nasty stamp, then shortly after a brawl ensued with Cheeky getting a straight red for throwing a punch and their 19 a straight red for running on while sin binned and getting involved - would be interested to see the ref's report, as from that point on he was getting some serious abuse from the West bench, to the point where they were almost on the pitch shouting abuse at him - pretty ugly scenes really

Re: Waterloo 32 West 27
Posted by: West Park Allotment (IP Logged)
Date: 02 April, 2012 11:11

Is that on the Waterloo website?

Regardless I have to agree with Denny on this one. We just don't seem well organised when we go away. Every player needs to start the season committing himself to playing every game and not being lured away by weddings, weekends away, etc etc. In my day your teammates would have made your life hell but the PlayStation generation don't seem bothered at all.

Re: Waterloo 32 West 27
Posted by: Freedom of speech (IP Logged)
Date: 02 April, 2012 11:19

What was wrong with removed post Dave, just someone expressing opinion on their assessment of how game was reffed! Why remove it?

Re: Waterloo 32 West 27
Posted by: whats this then (IP Logged)
Date: 02 April, 2012 11:28

its all on here [www.rolling-maul.com] under waterloo v west

Re: Waterloo 32 West 27
Posted by: davepicken (IP Logged)
Date: 02 April, 2012 11:39

Someone who did not use their own name or a name which had been used before. [In fact, there were two posts I removed which were similar].
The club has an official policy of supporting all refs and does its best to enforce this on match days - as well as on this official website.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 02/04/2012 12:16 by davepicken.

Re: Waterloo 32 West 27
Posted by: Supercodhead (IP Logged)
Date: 02 April, 2012 12:02

hooligans>>>

Goto Thread: PreviousNext
Goto: Message ListLog In
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net